Corrections
A correction never means a human editing the data. It means re-running the autonomous pipeline against a fresh snapshot.
What a correction is
If a vendor changes its policy, or you believe an assessment is out of date, a correction triggers an autonomous re-run: the system re-fetches the live document, captures a new immutable snapshot, re-extracts clauses, re-applies the verification gate and two-model consensus, re-scores, and republishes — entirely without human editing. The data is only ever written by the pipeline.
How to trigger one
Send a request to the public correction endpoint:
POST /api/corrections/{platform-slug}The platform's documents are enqueued for re-analysis and the worker (scripts/run-correction.mjs, also drained by the change-detection cron) executes the full re-run. Because every finding must re-pass the exact-substring verification gate against the new snapshot, a correction can only ever replace one machine-verified result with another.
Why no human edit path exists
A human-editable record could not carry the same guarantee. Every published claim traces to a verbatim quote anchored in an archived, hash-addressed snapshot; allowing manual edits would break that chain. The correction-as-re-run model keeps the entire dataset machine-verifiable end to end.
Generated from live pipeline data. Informational only, not legal advice.
AI Policy Intelligence Brief
Built for compliance officers, legal counsel, and SaaS founders. Subscribe to the email digest — one short brief when a tracked vendor materially changes its terms, training policy, or risk rating. Prefer in-app? Watch platforms in your alerts inbox instead.